You are Unregistered, please register to be able to read posts in all forums and participate in the discussion.
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11

    Question what's lowest poundage to use mech. broadheads

    I've read that mech. broadheads fly straighter and are more accurate than trad. broadheads.What is the lowest poundage you can use to get the mechs. to work properly.

  2. #2
    Site Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Saylorsburg PA
    Posts
    4,358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kirker23
    I've read that mech. broadheads fly straighter and are more accurate than trad. broadheads.What is the lowest poundage you can use to get the mechs. to work properly.
    you heard wrong - you can shoot just as accurately with fixed as with mechs - and I think its 55 lbs of kinetic energy.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cleveland,NC
    Posts
    183

    Default

    In the IBEP course, it is stated that mechanicals should not be used on bows with less that 55 pounds of draw weight.

    With the new technology in mechanicals....that may be outdated. The mechanicals have came a long way. IMO
    Take a kid with you. Show them the Great Outdoors. Pass it on.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Middletown, Pa
    Posts
    812

    Default

    It's not a matter of poundage. Whether mechanicals can perform well is determined by Kinetic Energy. There is no cut and dry answer about thgis either, but suffice it to say that very few knowledgeable people recommend them for anything less than about 60#. That being said, it comes down to having the proper arrow, too. Something heavy enough to carry some momentum once those blades start trying to punch hide and open up. Then there is the question of how large a cutting diameter they have. Wider cutting heads require more energy than a narrow cut. Blades that slide back, like Snipers or Tekan's don't require as much energy as those that flip back.

    It's pretty well accepted that it takes about 25% of the arrow's energy to punch the hide and flip those blades to the open position.

    Then ther is the problem of quartering shots where , if one blade hits at an angle, it may cause the arrow to cartwheel instead of just shooting straight through. This can greatly impede penetration.

    As you can see there are too many variables to make a blanket statement about just what poundage is required. I'd say if you want to be ethical about it then settle for no less than 60#. And that doesn't mean you should overbow yourself just for the purpose of shooting mechanicals. That surely won't help you at all.

  5. #5
    Bisquit....... BowhuntnHoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Hoosierville
    Posts
    13,884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinky
    In the IBEP course, it is stated that mechanicals should not be used on bows with less that 55 pounds of draw weight.

    With the new technology in mechanicals....that may be outdated. The mechanicals have came a long way. IMO

    This is what I have been told also 55# but I really like my MUZZY'S so have never experimented with expandables.


    "HONDA"

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Cleveland,NC
    Posts
    183

    Default

    I suggest that everyone read bfisher's post to the letter. He really makes some good points.

    I am testing my new mechanicals on my 3D targets. Thus far, all is good.

    The only reason that I am now testing expandables is due to the fact that my arrow speed has increased to a point where my "old faithfuls" don't fly well.

    I purchased a new bow and the arrow speeds went up. My hunting shafts are the same, still weighing in at 438 grs. The "old faithfuls" seem to plane some with the higher velocity.

    I agree with bfisher, that the arrow's KE will be the most likely issue affecting the performance of mechanicals on live animals. Along with cutting diameter, and blade configuration.
    Take a kid with you. Show them the Great Outdoors. Pass it on.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Youngsville, North Carolina
    Posts
    32

    Default

    My previous hunting arrow was 357gr. The bow was set on 69lbs (Mighty Mite). This combination produced 61-62 lbs of kinetic energy. At that time, I used Rocket mechanicals (85gr).
    The deer in North Carolina are smaller than northern deer. These broadheads haven't ever "failed." Broadside and quartering away shots have been pass throughs. I'm gonna type part of this again for a reason.

    Broadside and QUARTERING AWAY shots have been complete pass throughs without ANY failures.

    It's true...one can get a fixed blade broadhead to shot well, but MOST (not all) require additional tuning. I don't have to worry about tuning my Rockets. Wasp also makes excellent mechanicals.

    I will use Rocket Steelhead XP 125gr for elk this September on a 468 gr arrow producing approx. 68lbs of kinetic energy.

    I would shoot whatever you have confidence in through experimenting with your set-up. But hey, I'm not a pro.
    Home-a-lite
    "Doing the best I can....AT ALL TIMES!"

    Hunting:
    02 Mighty Mite 27'' 72lbs
    Beman Matrix 468gr. 255fps

    Target:
    04 Protec 27.5'' 70lbs
    GT Pro22 349gr. 260fps

  8. #8
    Member JVA54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Southeast Ill.
    Posts
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bfisher
    It's not a matter of poundage. Whether mechanicals can perform well is determined by Kinetic Energy. There is no cut and dry answer about thgis either, but suffice it to say that very few knowledgeable people recommend them for anything less than about 60#. That being said, it comes down to having the proper arrow, too. Something heavy enough to carry some momentum once those blades start trying to punch hide and open up. Then there is the question of how large a cutting diameter they have. Wider cutting heads require more energy than a narrow cut. Blades that slide back, like Snipers or Tekan's don't require as much energy as those that flip back.

    It's pretty well accepted that it takes about 25% of the arrow's energy to punch the hide and flip those blades to the open position.

    Then ther is the problem of quartering shots where , if one blade hits at an angle, it may cause the arrow to cartwheel instead of just shooting straight through. This can greatly impede penetration.

    As you can see there are too many variables to make a blanket statement about just what poundage is required. I'd say if you want to be ethical about it then settle for no less than 60#. And that doesn't mean you should overbow yourself just for the purpose of shooting mechanicals. That surely won't help you at all.

    Totaly agree kinetic energy is the key 60#+

  9. #9
    Site Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Saylorsburg PA
    Posts
    4,358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinky
    I suggest that everyone read bfisher's post to the letter. He really makes some good points.

    I am testing my new mechanicals on my 3D targets. Thus far, all is good.

    The only reason that I am now testing expandables is due to the fact that my arrow speed has increased to a point where my "old faithfuls" don't fly well.

    I purchased a new bow and the arrow speeds went up. My hunting shafts are the same, still weighing in at 438 grs. The "old faithfuls" seem to plane some with the higher velocity.

    I agree with bfisher, that the arrow's KE will be the most likely issue affecting the performance of mechanicals on live animals. Along with cutting diameter, and blade configuration.
    just a side note - if you uped the speed on your bow your arrows may no longer be spined correctly for the bow your shooting now. If you can't get your arrows to shoot right with a broadhead it could be due to the arrows not matching the bow. This can often be seen as "planning" or "not grouping" as the arrow isn't flexing correctly.

    Just a thought. I know my Muzzy's shoot just as well as mechs out to 30+ yards at 270+ FPS. A lot of times Mechs are seen as solutions to other problems, sort of like patching up the whole instead of fixing it. If they fly like your field points but your field points don't fly right the issue isn't with the tip but the arrow
    Last edited by Dredly; 07-29-2006 at 01:01 PM.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    12

    Default

    So how do I figure up KO?

    MY arrow is a Carbon Excel at 7.1 gpi. The arrow is 28 inches long and has a 100 grain point. It's shot out of a 55 pound bow. What is my KO? and is it enough for mechanical?
    Last edited by Keith; 08-06-2006 at 07:10 PM.

  11. #11
    Story of my life Radar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    N. Illinois
    Posts
    851

    Default Kinetic Energy Formula

    To figure out your kinetic energy here is the formula, you will need to know your arrow speed (AS), your arrow weight (AW).


    AS x AS x AW
    450,240



    Hope this helps
    Target: Hoyt ProElite XT3000 C2, 60# 30", CBE Quad Lite, CBE 3x .019, Trophy Taker, Easton Fatboy 400's(indoor) lightspeed 400 (outdoor)

    Hunting: 2009 Alphamax35 (Blacked out) 70#, 29", HHA Slider, Bisquit, Easton ACC 3-60, Rage 100 gr. 2 blade

Similar Threads

  1. poundage
    By cowboy50 in forum General Archery Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-09-2008, 10:46 AM
  2. poundage
    By cowboy50 in forum General Archery Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-22-2008, 05:07 PM
  3. Bow Poundage?
    By kbohunt in forum General Archery Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 01:05 AM
  4. what poundage
    By longcut36 in forum General Archery Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 11-19-2007, 10:43 PM
  5. ??poundage??
    By BUNNYMAN in forum General Archery Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-27-2006, 08:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •