Thread: Thoughts on bows after the ATA
01-09-2011, 01:50 PM #1
Thoughts on bows after the ATA
Why is it the industry has taken this long to address the riser torque from cable rods, cams, flexing risers, etc?
It seems a lot of companies are now jumping in to address this situation.
Bowtech: FLX Guard
G5: Ti Flex rod/Centroid cams
Darton: Curved cable rod
Mathews: Reverse assist roller
You can't tell me other bow engineers didn't know about this. At first I thought it was gimmick but after setting up and testing thousands of bows, I can tell you it's real and it makes a difference. Bows that address these problems are much easier to tune.
Why did it take this long to address this problem and why is it only a handful of companies are looking into correcting this problem?
I don't understand the concept of making a product "good enough" it will sell. I would want to build the best product I possible could.
Companies that continue to try to improve archery and educating the consumer are really helping the industry. Eventually, those that coast or continue the same-old, same-old will eventually find smaller sales figures.
I say thank you to the bow companies that continue to push the boundaries of bow development. It helps keep people interested in our favorite past time.
By jim p. in forum OfftopicReplies: 19Last Post: 06-11-2010, 09:37 PM
By jdcjac in forum General Archery ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 03-18-2009, 04:55 PM
By Dooby in forum General Archery ForumReplies: 14Last Post: 09-05-2008, 03:14 PM
By BUNNYMAN in forum General Archery ForumReplies: 31Last Post: 12-26-2006, 02:42 PM
By Chris in forum General Archery ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 11-14-2005, 10:49 AM